"Great minds have purposes, others have wishes." - Washington Irving

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 38 guests online.

Welcome to iBrattleboro!

Welcome to iBrattleboro!
It's a local news source by and for the people of Brattleboro, Vermont, published continually. You can get involved in this experiment in citizen journalism by submitting meeting results, news, events, stories, reviews, how-to's, recipes, places to go, things to do, or anything else important to Brattleboro. Or, just drop by to see what others have contributed.

Find iBrattleboro on:

 Twitter YouTube

Search the Archives

Ye Olde iBrattleboro Archive

Use the pulldown to choose desired number of results.

 

Search the first decade
of iBrattleboro archives
at Archive-It.org
Feb 20, 2003 to Feb 6, 2013

What It Looks Like To Be Tracked


Intergalactic Armies - Lightbeam VisualizationA couple nights ago I was shutting down my computer when, in the process of quitting Firefox, a mysterious screen opened before my eyes with what appeared to be a galaxy of circles and triangles, interconnecting and sprouting new satellites as I watched. Closer inspection revealed it to be a graphic visualization of sites I had recently visited with all the third party sites they had notified in clusters around them. It was a moment out of War Games. Had I been hacked, I wondered?  But no, it turned out to be Lightbeam, a browser add-on that allows you to see in real time how your information is being shared on the Internet by the sites you visit, and with whom. I vaguely remember installing it a while back but I never got around to using it, hence my initial surprise when it seemingly opened itself in my browser.  But once I saw what it revealed, I was riveted.

Let's look at some sites, I said to myself. I opened The Guardian newspaper -- dozens of third party connections appeared on the graph. Ok, how about the Washington Post and New York Times--dozens more appeared, forging connections with the other sites on the graph through their own third party connections. Then, just for yucks, I tried the Brattleboro Reformer site -- 54 more triangles appeared.

Finally, with some trepidation, I loaded iBrattleboro. Wouldn't you know, with the exception of one little shared image on Tumblr, which we have since removed, we were free and clear. No lines arced out from iBrattleboro to connect it with the rest of the galactic denizens and their vast armies of tracking cookies. Phew!  We had escaped the clutches of the evil empire of data merchants -- for now.

Confirming a suspicion, I cleared all the cookies from my browser down to the last one, and then loaded the New York Times again. Over 150 cookies instantly appeared with more added the longer I let the page stand idle. At one point, as I compulsively cleared cookies, more appeared even though I hadn't returned to the Times tab. Despite the fact that the page was not active, they were maintaining a connection with my browser and pushing cookies at me. Not until I closed the tab with the NYT page did the cookies stop rolling in.

I'm in the web biz and have been almost since the beginning. I understand why cookies are used and cases in which they're not only acceptable but useful, as when, for instance, I want to stay logged into a site I frequently visit such as iBrattleboro.  If I've applied for an account on a site, I'm fine with them getting my login from a cookie.  But 150 cookies planted by a site where you don't even have an account and have not signed in is simply unacceptable not to mention exploitive. The only reason we tolerate it is because the vast majority of us do not have any idea it's going on.

Well, folks, it is. The sites you love the most and use the most frequently (with the exception of this one) are pulling data from you almost with every keystroke. It's called "tracking" and it's the source of a great deal of revenue to companies as different as Facebook and the New York Times, not to mention the hundreds of other tracking and so-called research companies that serve them and anyone else interested in buying or selling user data.

You can solve this problem through browser settings by choosing to accept third-party cookies 'never' instead of 'always' or 'from sites you visit.' That way, if you go to the New York Times, you'll only get cookies from the New York Times and not from dozens of advertising and data companies.  The only drawback to this method is that some sites will refuse to work for you if you don't set cookie access wide open by allowing third party cookies. There's usually no reason why you need third party cookies, but some sites want you to take all of them, for the sole reason that if you don't, they can't track you. Your only choice in this case is to avoid that site.

The cookies I found on a survey of several dozen large sites, including government, education, e-commerce, and media, fell into two general categories -- social media and advertising. Among the most frequently seen social media connections were the usual suspects: Google, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube. These guys are collecting and 'monetizing' our data. Google Analytics is  commonly used to tell site owners who is visiting their site, so you'll often see cookies for that. They're collecting and selling data too. So are DoubleClick and Google which power most web advertising campaigns. The rest of the rabble just like to know where you've been, so they can add it to your profile and sell it to advertisers and other interested parties.

If you want to take this voyage of discovery for yourself, download the Lightbeam add-on for Firefox and follow the simple instructions for use. I guarantee you'll be fascinated. You can also try the cookie experiment (perhaps on a browser you don't use that often if you're afraid of disrupting other services). Close all tabs, clear cookies, then load one site, and go back and look at your cookies. Did your chosen site dump a few or a lot? Repeat with other sites you like. It's highly educational. Even if you don't clear all your cookies, you might enjoy seeing what's already on your computer.  So many tracking beacons, each one phoning home...

Information is power, and unaccountable Internet companies should probably be prevented from knowing everything there is to know about us. Simply giving our data to them because we don't understand what they're doing is not going to prevent them from misusing that data in the future. Hell, they're misusing it now. Capitulation is the easy path and very likely the one we'll collectively take, but like all abdications of that sort, we'll almost certainly regret it in time. Or not.

Happy browsing, everyone!

Test Results:

(Not for the faint of heart)

In my official recorded test of just how many third party sites are contacted in a typical browse of the morning news, I loaded six media sites:  New York Times, Washington Post, Guardian UK, Business Insider, Brattleboro Reformer, and iBrattleboro.

Here's what it looked like:

Six Media Files - Visualization

The big glom in the middle consists of the media sites mentioned above with the exception of iBrattleboro.  If you look off to the right you'll see a little dot with an i in it.  That's iBrattleboro. The other sites contacted over 336 third party sites just by loading their home pages.

Full disclosure regarding iBrattleboro: if there is embedded content displayed on any page, third parties will be contacted and cookies will be planted.  In this test, we made sure no embedded content was displayed above the fold.  Embedded content refers to things such as YouTube videos and SoundCloud files.

Speaking of cookies, in the test depicted above, I cleared all cookies before running it and then checked them after loading the six sites.  There were approximately 190 companies listed, each with one or more cookies.  By my estimation, there were at least 300 and probably closer to 400 cookies planted.  The browser doesn't provide an exact count.  If you look at the names in the list from the first screen-load, you'll see that many of them begin with the word 'ad.'  That should be a clue as to their purpose, although there are others that include the word 'predictive,' which is less reassuring.

Media Site Cookies

Click here to learn more about Lightbeam for Firefox.

»

Comments | 7

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
 #

This is very creepy. I think

This is very creepy. I think about some of the spur on the moment random searches I sometimes do and ...yikes.
It's unsettling to say the least.

 
 #

Fascinating!

I just upgraded my I-thought-they-were-already-good browser settings.

 
 #

Clickbait

Good reason to stay away from "clickbait" and resist the impulse to click on those intriguing stories that pop up on Facebook and other websites.

 
 #

Double

And... I have no idea why that comment just loaded twice...

Edit: Fixed it.

 
 #

So many thoughts

1. This is the number one reason we don't use "share" and "like" features on this site, btw. (You're welcome!)

2. One of those sprawling connections in Lise's graphic is the Reformer.

3. I'd like to see Vermont take a stand on this. Vermont should pass a law that allows us to collect fees from anyone tracking us and making money off of it.

As it stands now, any 3rd party data gathering company can gather as much data as they want, rather secretly, for FREE. Then they make a fortune off of it. Their CEO's have nice homes and cars and bank accounts. Because of us.

That has to stop. There needs to be a cost to these data gathering companies. It needs to be significant enough so that they stop and think for a moment. Is this worth it? Right now, free data is very much worth it.

What if we could use our cookie list as an invoice, and get reimbursed for our data? (Lise would have made $4 for her few minutes of surfing at 1 penny per cookie.)

4. Within a couple of hours of Lise posting this, Google sent me an alert notifying me of a mention of iBrattleboro. Even without direct connection, companies crawl the web to gather publicly available info.

5. Yes, you have a permanent record. There are companies that know roughly what you did online every hour of every day, going back for as long as you've used the internet.

6. Your permanent record is wrong. Lots of their assumptions, based on AI and algorithms, aren't correct.

7. Really, go try the plug-in. Watching it work in real-time is much more informative than just seeing a still image.

 
 #

Un-freakin'-believable

I knew stuff like this was going on, but I had no idea how extensive it really was.
It's another example of the common business practice: "privatize the profits; socialize the costs"

I'm in agreement with Chris on this one:
"I'd like to see Vermont take a stand on this. Vermont should pass a law that allows us to collect fees from anyone tracking us and making money off of it."
To me, this seems analogous to a Carbon Tax.

 
 #

data has value

Payments could be built-in to browsers. In the preferences, instead of selecting "Accept 3rd Party Cookies", it could be "Accept Payment For 3rd Party Cookies and Tracking" with an option to deposit payments to PayPal or a bank account.

It's our data, and is being taken without compensation to us, and makes others wealthy. It definitely has a value. I don't see any reason we should be obligated to give away our data for free. If a third-party wants our "services" they should pay up.

Maybe it has dynamic pricing, too, allowing these third party folks to try to outbid one another. : )

...

We adults are concerned about this, but it doesn't have an age filter. Kids get tracked. I just tried it out with Disney, Nick Jr. and PBSKids.... Just three sites homepages and 61 third party connections were generated, to things such as scorecardresearch, doubleclick, and lots of google tracking sites.

 

iBrattleboro Poll

Brattleboro is considering a second sidewalk snowplow. That snowplow

Choices