WSESD Board Meeting Agenda and Minutes

WINDHAM SOUTHEAST SCHOOL DISTRICT

53 Green Street
Brattleboro, VT 05301
www.wsesu.org

NOTICE OF BOARD MEETING

The Windham Southeast School District Board will meet at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
May 3, 2022 in the WRCC Cusick Conference Room and remotely via Zoom.
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82838451714?pwd=QmlvL1dlMndFRzRSYzg4bFFkN1l5QT09
Meeting ID: 828 3845 1714
Passcode: mErR04
One tap mobile
+13017158592,,82838451714#,,,,*608341# US (Washington DC)
+13126266799,,82838451714#,,,,*608341# US (Chicago)
Dial by your location
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
Meeting ID: 828 3845 1714
Passcode: 608341
Find your local number: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kcaAibXADp

AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 p.m. – Kelly Young, Board Chair
II. CONSENT AGENDA
CLERK’S REPORT – Approval of Minutes – April 12

III. Recognition of Ali West, 2022 Recipient of Vermont Nutrition Association’s School Nutrition Outstanding Achievement Award (presented at the 4/13/2022 WSESU Board Meeting)

IV. Public Comment on Non-agenda Items (10 minutes)
V. Unfinished Business
A. Sexual Abuse Investigation Update – Outreach and Education
B. Update on BUHS School Climate Surveys
C. SRO (School Resource Office) and Task Force Proposal

VI. Committee Assignments

VII. Administrative Report
Resignations / Hiring

VIII. Fiscal Report

IX. New Business


A. EES Head Start/Early Head Start Application for COLA and Quality Improvement Funds – Action Needed
B. Motion to award the BUHS HVAC Mechanical Systems replacement project Bid to BG Mechanical in the amount of $473,860, as authorized by the WSESD Board-approved capital plan.
C. Motion to award the BUHS HVAC Controls System replacement project bid to Control Technologies, Inc., in the amount of $603,284, as authorized by the WSESD Board-approved capital plan.
D. Motion to approve implementing upgrades to creating a living school yard at the Oak Grove School to facilitate independent, exploratory learning. Improvements include building a pathway for accessibility, edible and fragrant vegetation, and organic interactive play spaces. Students will also have the ability to plant and maintain their own plants. $15,000 in ARP ESSER funds are expected to cover the cost.
E. Authorization for the WSESD Personnel Committee to approve hiring recommendations on behalf of the Board from this meeting forward through the
end of the summer – Action Needed

EXECUTIVE SESSION (If Needed)

……….

Note: These proposed minutes should be considered preliminary until they are approved by the
Board at a future meeting.
WINDHAM SOUTHEAST SCHOOL DISTRICT (WSESD) BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2022
REGULAR BOARD MEETING – 6:00PM
HYBRID MEETING: WRCC CUSICK CONFERENCE ROOM & REMOTELY VIA ZOOM
DRAFT MINUTES
WSESD Board Members Present: Chairperson Kelly Young (KY), Liz Adams (LA), Anne Beekman
(AB), Lana Dever (LD), Michelle Green (MG), Tim Maciel (TM), Shaun Murphy (SM), David
Schoales (DSC), Deborah Stanford (DST).
WSESD Board Members Absent: Emily Murphy Kaur
WSESU & WSESD Administrators Present: Interim Superintendent Mark Speno, Business
Administrator Frank Rucker, BUHS Principal Steve Perrin, Oak Grove School Principal Mary
Kauffman, BAMS Principal Keith Lyman, WRCC Director Nancy Wiese, Guilford Central School
Principal John Gagnon, Green Street School Interim Principal Kate Margaitis, Dummerston School
Principal Julianne Eagan, BUHS Assistant Principal Chris Day.
Media Present: Chris Mays
Others Present: Jaime Contois, Mindy Haskins Rogers, Mike Szostak, Mikaela Simms, Nakia Adams,
Lyndall Boal, Kaiya Colby, Lucy Corbin, Robin Macy, Liana Moskowitz, Anna Mullany, Imani
Namutebi, Z’Aira Pacheco-Wright, Winston Sailsman, Habame Scholz-Karabakakis, Henry Zacchini,
Amanda Rodriquez, Jeffrey Kendrick, Ricky Davidson, Bethany Rahnquist, Jody Normandeau, Ruby
McAdoo
Please note: this attendance may be incomplete.


I. CALL TO ORDER

Chair KY called the meeting to order at 6:02pm.

II. SRO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION – POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

Mikaela Simms introduced the presentation and provided some background. Highlights included:
The history of the project leading to the report.
This started with Youth4Change.
The report is based on the lived experiences of the people most affected.
It’s more of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, study.
A reminder that equity isn’t just about what the majority wants.
The students really did the work on this project.

Mike Szostak spoke about the SRO Task Force. Highlights included:


How it was organized.
What the subcommittees were, how they did their work, and what they studied.
A note that this is all in the report’s Executive Summary.

The study found that BUHS has an effective safety staff.
The task force has four recommendations:
This continue without an SRO.
BUHS establish or explore establishing a liaison officer from the Brattleboro Police Department or the Windham County Sheriff Department. This person should be skilled at working with young people, and will come on campus when needed.
More emphasis on a more inclusive school atmosphere.
Build school-wide systems for accountability and repair to address systemic biases, and place more emphasis on mental health supports.


The task force’s work and findings are mostly a result of the students’ work.
The students who worked on the study introduced themselves. They included Kaiya Colby, Lucy Corbin, Z’Aira Pacheco-Wright, Amanda Rodriquez, and others. Note: Because of audio limitations, the Board Recorder was unable to accurately identify all of the students.
Mikaela Simms shared a document of the SRO Report. The students reviewed it. Highlights included:
The subcommittees.
The work the subcommittees did.
Who and what was included in the focus groups.
That SROs were not specifically mentioned in the questions, and SROs were only mentioned if a participant in the focus group brought it up.
A number of themes emerged in the focus groups.
Students’ experiences with the administration and disparities in how discipline is administered among different groups.
Students’ experiences with power dynamics in school.
Students’ experiences with each other.
Inclusion / diversity / justice issues.
Supports, or lack thereof.
COVID issues.

TM thanked and commended the SRO study committee, and Mikaela, and praised their excellent research and reporting methods. He indicated support for their recommendations, and said the Board must closely monitor the BUHS environment and work to improve it. He noted this work is not just the responsibility of a few people; it’s for everyone to do.

A lengthy discussion ensued with students, Board members, school staff, school administrators, and community members participating. Highlights include:


Challenges staff have with bathroom patrols.
The legal implications of reporting the results of bullying / harassment / and hazing complaints.
The leadership qualities exhibited by the students who presented on the study.
The relevance of this report to the sexual abuse allegations.
This group performed valuable and rare work: they got teenagers to open up and speak their minds.
The study’s findings should not be seen as opinions the presenters generated; these findings came from their community, they came from student focus groups.
The experience of being a dual-language student.
These students did graduate-level work.
BUHS Principal Steve Perrin expressed disappointment that no administrators, school counselors, or school safety personnel were involved in the project. He refuted some of the report’s findings. He recommended the students join the various school groups to improve the school culture.

LD pointed out the optics of the administration—white people in power, mostly male—on one side, and the students—young women of color, talking about their lived experiences—on the other side. She was struck by the administration’s impulse to counter the study’s statements, instead of listening and absorbing them. She said she could not imagine how including the administration in the study would have been effective, because the study necessitated students speaking freely, which they are not likely to do when the administration is present. The school asked these students to do a job, and they did it.
SM commended the students on their work. He dissented from Steve Perrin’s suggestion that they join a group, and noted they have already formed a group.
DST expressed her disappointment that the students had to reiterate that these were not their opinions and were study results, and that the administration responded so quickly in defensiveness, instead of simply listening.
Henry Zacchini disputed the statement that the administration was not involved in this study; he said he was on the committee and administrators were at some of the early meetings.
Nancy Wiese said she is offended by some of the Board members’ comments, and she does not believe Board members support administrators. She said she is being marginalized, and that school administrators have difficult jobs. She said current school staff cannot be held accountable for Mr. Hecker’s actions from decades ago.
Anna Mullany, who facilitated the committee, spoke about how people not in power are often not believed by people who are in power. She noted that, regarding the SRO, it’s important to consider other research and writing on this issue, which is in the report, and that BUHS is not unique in these issues.
Liana Moskowitz spoke about the difference between listening to students and being marginalized.
MG wants the Board to request the Climate Survey responses, data, and what the administration is doing with this, from the administration.
A recommendation for more regular meetings between Board members and each school’s community.
III. STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE TO WSESD BOARD

MOTION BY LD THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL AS OUTLINED IN THE CALL FOR STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES IN THE WSESD SCHOOL BOARD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO TODAY’S AGENDA THAT ENABLES US TO OFFER A ONE- YEAR POSITION TO TWO STUDENTS WHO ARE EITHER FULL-TIME RISING SOPHOMORES OR JUNIORS LIVING IN THE WSESD, AND IN THIS VENTURE WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE BUHS ADMINISTRATION AS WE IMPLEMENT THIS INITIATIVE. SM SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

MG thanked the Board members who worked on this.

LA encouraged all students to come to Board meetings.

A discussion ensued on why the Board specified its parameters for which students can join the Board.

KY called for a meeting break from 7:21pm to 7:26pm.


IV. CONSENT AGENDA

– CLERK’S REPORT –


Approval of Minutes – December 14, January 25, March 15 (all pending), March 22, March 29, April 5

MOTION BY MG TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. LA SECONDED.

Discussion: DST said the March 29 minutes were not consistent in identifying whether it was she, or DSC, spoke at the meeting. TM said he will correct those minutes.

VOTE ON THE MG MOTION: MOTION WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
– FINANCES
Warrants of March 21, 2022
Warrant No. 1274 in the amount of $ 279.00
Warrant No. 1275 in the amount of 12,595.00
Warrant No. 1276 in the amount of 136,777.00
Warrant No. 1277 in the amount of 2,642.36
Warrant No. 1278 in the amount of 129,426.22
$281,719.58
Warrants of March 28, 2022
Warrant No. 1281 in the amount of $ 20,563.35
Warrant No. 1286 in the amount of 6,000.00
Warrant No. 1287 in the amount of 4,042.20
Warrant No. 1288 in the amount of 830.50
Warrant No. 1289 in the amount of 49,904.67
$81,340.72
Warrants of April 5, 2022
Warrant No. 1291 in the amount of $ 1,880.49
Warrant No. 1292 in the amount of 264,813.83
Warrant No. 1293 in the amount of 3,100.10
Warrant No. 1294 in the amount of 29,808.32
Warrant No. 1295 in the amount of 8,362.75
Warrant No. 1296 in the amount of 2,872.92
Warrant No. 1297 in the amount of 902,733.94
$1,213,572.35

MOTION BY DSC TO APPROVE THE WARRANTS. LD SECONDED.

Discussion: SM noted the Finance Committee reviewed these warrants at their meeting.

VOTE ON THE DSC MOTION: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

Payrolls
March 25, 2022 $1,453,618.17

MOTION BY LD TO APPROVE THE PAYROLLS. DST SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

V. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

Jody Normandeau of Dummerston had two comments:

1. She alerted interested parties about the weighting study happening in the Legislature. She invited everyone to contact their representatives.

2. She asked for the Finance Committee meetings to be filmed. She made a recommendation that every town in the WSESD have a representative on the Finance Committee. KY responded: That afternoon’s Finance Committee meeting was recorded to allow the Board Recorder to do her job, and Frank Rucker has it; she will look into recording all Finance Committee meetings. And, the next meeting’s agenda should include the weighting study; at the Finance Committee meeting, two WSESD Legislative Representatives were at that meeting to discuss the study. Bethany Rahnquist said she is concerned about the two-minute limit on each person making public comments. She asked if when the Board responses, it takes away time from other participants.
KY responded: The Board response does not take away time. And, this meeting is of the School Board so it can do its work.
KY temporarily relinquished her position as Chair to DSC, who took over as Chair.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Sexual Abuse Investigation Update – Outreach and Education
DSC gave an update. Highlights included:
The Board has not met with the investigator since the last Board meeting.
Progress continues on the outreach plan.
There will be more updates soon.
TM spoke about Erin’s Law and said he wants it on the next Board agenda.

VII. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS

DSC noted the late hour and recommended this item be tabled.
KY disagreed, and asked for one more attempt to fill vacancies, especially in the Personnel Committee.
DSC took nominations from Board members who want to be part of the Personnel Committee.
AB nominated herself.
LA nominated herself.
KY nominated herself to remain on the Personnel Committee.
DSC reviewed the Personnel Committee’s tasks, including over the summer.

MOTION BY DSC TO APPROVE ANNE BEEKMAN, LIZ ADAMS, AND KELLY YOUNG TO THE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. MG SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
– Resignations / Hiring

Mark Speno noted the WSESD has 65 openings, and the candidate pools are shallow.


Mark announced the resignations:
Emily McIntire Green Street School Music Teacher
Adam Altshuler Green Street School Physical Education Teacher
Megan Altshuler Green Street School Grade 4 Teacher
Mary Beth Brain Putney Central School Grade 6-8 Math
Molly Sauvain Green Street School Grade 5 Teacher

MOTION BY TM TO ACCEPT, WITH REGRET, THE FIVE RESIGNATIONS AS PRESENTED. LD SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.


Mark announced the new hires:
Megan Altshuler Dummerston School Academic Support
Matthew Betz BUHS Instructional Coach
Orlando Alvarez WRCC Criminal Justice
Taylor Chase BUHS Spanish
Nancy Kowalski Oak Grove Academic Support
Michele Nelson BUHS Academic Support
Meghan Rink Guilford Central School School Nurse
Molly Sauvain Guilford Central School Academic Support
Leanne Souksanh Guilford Central School School Social Worker
Jennifer Tallini BUHS Family & Consumer Science
Ruth Venman-Clay Guilford Central School Grade 3 Teacher
Mark noted that one new hire, Amelia Smith, has rescinded her acceptance.
MOTION BY LD TO APPROVE THE NEW HIRES AS PRESENTED. MG SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A discussion ensued amongst school principals John Gagnon, Steve Perrin, Kate Margaitis, Keith Lyman, and WRCC Director Nancy Wiese, about hiring challenges, and possible outcomes from the school weighting studies. Keith noted the students who presented the SRO study today exhibited excellent leadership skills, and they are good candidates for teaching and leadership positions at WSESD; they should get in touch in five or six years.
IX. FISCAL REPORT
SM announced the Finance Committee met that afternoon. He said Reps. Kornheiser and Coffey were there to discuss the school funding project, and the Committee also discussed the BUHS HVAC capital projects. Frank noted he will present on the capital projects at the next Board meeting. SM spoke about the importance of air quality in school buildings. DSC noted the late hour.

MOTION BY MG TO EXTEND THE MEETING BY 10 MINUTES. TM SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

A. Plan to Address High-Risk Students / Families at High Risk
Mark Speno reported he has been meeting with families of students who have COVID-related high needs, to develop individual education plans.
A discussion ensued on options for virtual learning.
A discussion ensued on COVID protocols and its implications for the school community and families.
XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION


A. EXECUTIVE SESSION – 1 V.S.A. §313(a)(1)(A) Contracts

MOTION BY KY TO ENTER INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AS STATED, UNDER 1 V.S.A. §313(a)(1)(A) CONTRACTS. DSC SECONDED. KY ADDED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO HER MOTION TO INVITE FRANK RUCKER AND MARK SPENO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. DSC ACCEPTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.


The Board entered into Executive Session at 8:30pm.
The Board rose from Executive Session 9:13pm.
MOTION BY TM TO OFFER A SEVERANCE PACKAGE AS PRESENTED, AND TO APPROVE THE CLASSIFIED STAFF CONTRACT AS PRESENTED. DSC SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. EXECUTIVE SESSION – 1 V.S.A. §313(a)(3) The appointment or employment or evaluation of a public officer or employee, provided that the public body shall make a final decision to hire or appoint a public officer or employee in an open meeting and shall explain the reasons for its final decision during open meeting.
MOTION BY KY TO ENTER INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER 1 V.S.A. §313(a)(3) THE APPOINTMENT OR EMPLOYMENT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE, PROVIDED THAT THE PUBLIC BODY SHALL MAKE A FINAL DECISION TO HIRE OR APPOINT A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE IN AN OPEN MEETING AND SHALL EXPLAIN THE REASONS FOR ITS FINAL DECISION DURING OPEN MEETING. MG SECONDED.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
.
The Board entered into Executive Session at 9:18pm.
The Board rose from Executive Session at 9:48pm.
The Board took no action.
MOTION BY KY TO ADJOURN.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:53pm.
DOCUMENTS PRESENTED:
The SRO Report.
Respectfully submitted by Wendy M. Levy from minutes taken by Wendy M. Levy.

This represents my understanding of the above dated meeting. If you have any changes, please submit at the next meeting.

Leave a Reply