Is President Donald Trump really going to be Impeached this time? People on social media are in a frenzy and they want a list of names of people who were clients of the now deceased Jeffrey Epstein.
If President Donald Trump was a client of Jeffrey Epstein, and if Trump, prior to becoming President, engaged in sex with underage minor girl(s), then should he be Impeached now?
What is the statute of limitations, legally, on rape of a minor?
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation
https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline
“The files relating to Epstein include… images and videos
of victims who … appear to be minors, and … videos
and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography. … Much of the material is subject to court-ordered sealing…. the seal
served only to protect victims and did not expose
any additional third-parties to allegations of
illegal wrongdoing. … we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography.”
If the F.B.I. has valid documentary evidence of who the female victims were, then all they have to do is ask them who the men in the videos were who they had illegal pornographic underage sex with.
Or, even better, why doesn’t the F.B.I. just open their eyes and see for themselves in the videos and images who the male “clients” were?
Just what is so hard about that?
Now, remember, former President Bill Clinton was not Impeached for having a woman under his desk in the Oval Office giving him alleged oral sex.
But, she was an adult.
Many of the girls involved in the allegations against the now deceased Jeffrey Epstein, and the very alive but imprisoned Ghislaine Maxwell,
involve 14 year old girls.
14 year old girls are children.
Now, if we could get the F.B.I. to show the public some of these videos and images, would we see President Donald Trump having sex or oral sex
or any kind of pornographic sex, with a 14 year old girl?
There is so much huge social media discussion about this case,
where in the current litigation before the Supreme Court of the United States,
Ghislaine Maxwell is asking for her conviction to be thrown out on various grounds.
In the process of trying to get her conviction thrown out,
will evidence be brought forward that would make even Republicans
want to vomit and Impeach President Donald Trump,
if he is found on video having sex with a 14 year old girl?
If you are so inclined you can read the actual court documents wherein
Ghislaine Maxwell, associated with Jeffrey Epstein when he was alive,
is pleading for her conviction to be overturned on various grounds, and
the United States Department of Justice is arguing in their response to the
Supreme Court of the United States that her conviction should not be overturned and she should stay in prison where they feel she belongs.
It’s not the result of all of these legal proceedings that will prompt any action for Impeachment of President Donald Trump, it is if, and only if, evidence is allowed to come out
that may prove he did something nasty to someone’s little girl
when her parents weren’t watching.
The moral of this story is, watch your 14 year old daughter like a hawk!
COURT LINKS TO LEARN EVERYTHING AS OF JULY 17, 2025
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1073.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1073/365132/20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
Do you remember Christopher Helali, former Vermont candidate?
I absolutely can not stop laughing!
Christopher Helali, a former Vermont political candidate,
https://www.brattleborotv.org/meet-the-candidates/christopher-helali-candidate-representative-congress-c/
discusses a phone book which has ended up on a Vermont farm,
and just who did it belong to?
Jeffrey Epstein (now deceased)!
It was put up for sale on ebay, and Christopher Helali decided to buy it ,
and then there was a lot of work in verifying the contents.
It contained the names of Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7box15ryvx8
My email to ChristopherHelali@gmail.com High Baliff, Orange County
Dear Christopher Helali,
There is a lot of social media and some news stories recently where a lot of people wonder if President Donald Trump was on a client list of the deceased Jeffrey Epstein.
You have become a peripheral party to the Jeffry Epstein saga
because you were in a video about his 1990s phone book
which was found on a sidewalk in New York.
A woman found the phone book on a sidewalk, contacted
several media entities which showed no interest, then
needing money for a car repair, she sold it to you on
Ebay.
Jeffrey Epstein has died.
His associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, has filed an appeal to
the Supreme Court of the United States seeking to have
her criminal connection overturned.
At least 3 years ago, you mailed the phone book to be verified
by other media and a forensic expert.
VIDEO TITLE:
“How Did Jeffrey Epstein’s Phone Book End Up On A Farm In Vermont?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7box15ryvx8
” Jul 23, 2021 #JeffreyEpstein #AddressBook #InsiderNews
Business Insider has obtained and forensically tested a never-before-seen
address book that appears to have belonged to Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s.
The book contains 349 names and offers a new window into the
late sex offender’s social circle. Business Insider reporters spent
months calling prominent names that were
never associated with the billionaire before.”
https://christopherhelali.com/
You ran as a political candidate in 2020
and lost, and then in 2024 you won the office of High Baliff
for Orange County while you lived in Vershire, Vermont.
Christopher Helali
Address
2545 Parker Road Vershire, Vermont 05079
Phone
802-304-0276
https://www.ourherald.com/articles/helali-wins-high-bailiff-as-write-in/
“The high bailiff’s most noteworthy responsibility is to take over
for the sheriff in the case that the sheriff becomes incapacitated.”
https://www.vtsheriffs.com/learn-about-the-vsa.php
“About the Vermont Sheriffs’ Association:
Chances are you don’t give much thought to the County Sheriff.
You may see an article in the paper, a name on the ballot,
or a patrol car along the side of the road.”
https://christopherhelali.com/
ChristopherHelali@gmail.com
COURT LINKS
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1073.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1073/355252/20250424150144637_24-__PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1073/365132/20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/opa/
JANE DOE #43
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4581676/jane-doe-43-v-epstein/
Ghislaine Maxwell wants Epstein’s Estate to pay her legal fees
https://www.vicourts.org/workspaces/One.aspx?objectId=16556241&contextId=15978985
https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16556248
“Katie Johnson” a Jane Doe v. Donald Trump before she says she was
threatened and drops her case
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
MY QUESTION (as a person who watches the news andenjoys the discussions on social media):
Christopher Helali,
Do you still have (the deceased)
Jeffry Epstein’s 1990s phone book?
Christopher Helali of Vermont sold Jeffrey Epstein's Phone book at an Auction in April 2025
News search:
A notebook of contact information that belonged to Jeffrey Epstein
was sold by Christopher Helali of Vermont for $10,000
at Alexander Historical Auctions in Elkton on April 2, 2025.
The 1990s notebook had 221 names which were not in the
2004 phone book the F.B.I. used in their investigations.
Since the F.B.I. did not have those 221 names during their
investigations, would they be significant now in creating a
list of deceased Jeffrey Eptein’s clients?
Update on whether or not there might be evidence to Impeach Donald Trump for past dirty deeds!
July 22nd Update on the thorn in President Donald Trump’s side!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1073.html
Ghislaine Maxwell, who helped Jeffrey Epstein procure underage minor girls
for illegal act of sex, appealed her conviction to the Supreme Court of the
United States, which has not ruled yet.
Many news sources report that Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to talk to federal
prosecutors at the Department of Justice. Here’s the trick question: will they
only ask questions regarding the information they used in the previous case
leading to the final arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, which President Trump isn’t
worried about because the DOJ claims to have no evidence in that pile of stuff
to prosecute anyone else (like Donald Trump)?
Or, will they allow Ghislaine Maxwell to talk about the over 200 names on
Jeffrey Epstein’s Phone book which was brought to the public’s attention
after Vermonter (now High Baliff in Orange County) Christopher Helali
(a prominent leader in the Communist party) bought the Jeffrey Epstein
phone book on Ebay and then sold it at Auction in April 2025 for $10,000.?
The woman who sold the Jeffrey Epstein phone book, with names and addresses,
on Ebay to Christopher Helali, had held onto it for around 20 years.
News sources claim it has been verified as really, really, real.
Now, here’s the catch, a particular Jane Doe (aka Katie Johnson)
who claimed Donald Trump
raped her was apparently not included in all of the previous litigation
and would not be included in the pile of stuff President Donald Trump
isn’t worried about. If there was any information about her, it would be
in the Jeffrey Epstein phone book that Christopher Helali received
$10,000 for at an auction in April 2025.
She started by filing a federal court action, apparently all by her self,
and the federal judge dismissed it on the basis that she had “no private
right of action” to charge Donald Trump with a crime.
The girl then got an attorney, but was the victim, allegedly of threats,
and so dropped her case to protect herself and her family.
I see two problems:
(1) how often does a federal court dismiss a case against
a celebrity or a wealthy person on the basis of “no private right of action to charge them
with a crime” and then fail to refer it to the U.S. Attorneys Office? I am suspecting
this happens way too often when a person can not afford an attorney and tries
to proceed on their own.
(2) How often does an attorney, a licensed lawyer,
convince a client to drop their case, because, unknowing to the client, the lawyer
has received a huge vacation donation from the other side? After all, if you
are sueing someone for X number of dollars, then x can offer your attorney money
to convince you to drop your case,
particularly when there’s a celebrity or rich person involved.
Did this Jane Doe (Katie Johnson) leave a trail? Of course she did!
Will Ghislaine Maxwell try to talk about this Jane Doe (Katie Johnson) or will
the Department of Justice tell her that they will not discuss anyone in the
Jeffrey Epstein phone book (that Vermonter Christopher Helali sold at auction
for $10,000 in April 2025) who did not appear in the later phone book?
Why were there over 200 more contact entries in the earlier Jeffrey Epstein
phone book that communist Christopher Helali sold?
Ghislaine Maxwell should be allowed to discuss Jane Doe (Katie Johnson) with the DOJ.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
Jane Doe (Katie Johnson) in her own words:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk38JAwEUOg
2 More Quick Updates! Strange things are happening!
(1) Representatives to U.S. Congress (including Vermont’s own Becca Balint)
got to head home early for their August break because the Speaker of the House,
Mike Johnson ordered them to leave
rather than discuss the Jeffrey Epstein Document Debate which
could lead to a Vote on releasing classified documents in the Jeffrey Epstein
investigation. They will be back at the U.S. Congress in September.
Becca Balint now has plenty of time to do “Town Hall Meetings”
and tell us all she knows!
(2) Various news stories stated that Virginia Giuffree had received
a $16 MILLION DOLLAR settlement from United Kingdom’s Prince Andrew
who took advantage of her when she was a minor teenager,
the sexual conquest being arranged by Jeffrey Epstein.
Then, oddly enough, after communist Christopher Helali of Vermont
sold the Jeffrey Epstein 1990s phone book at an Auction in early April 2025
for $10,000., Virginia Guiffree committed suicide later that same month.
Of course, there are questions about her “suicide”, and who bought the
1990s Epstein phone book.
July 23 Update: One Dead Attorney, One Obama Diversion, One Walmart Selling Epstein's Phonebooks!
One of Jeffrey Epstein’s attorneys just died.
O.K., so he was old, but dead is convenient for President Donald Trump; right?
https://www.newsweek.com/roy-black-dead-80-jeffrey-epstein-attorney-plea-deal-2102731
Walmart is selling the contents of the contacts of everyone
on Jeffrey Epstein’s two phone books from the 1990s up through the 2000s.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Jeffrey-Epstein-s-Secret-Black-Books-Two-Leaked-Address-Books-Epstein-Island-House-Manual-From-Jeffrey-Epstein-Gh-Paperback-9781957452067/990174995
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
and Tulsi Gabbard,
United States Director of National Intelligence,
held a press conference to explain that the real culprit the
American public should be concerned about is former
President Barack Obama, and even if the allegations
they are implying are way past the statute of limitations,
then maybe they can refer former
President Barack Obama’s behaviour to the Department
of Justice to investigate him for Treason
(to take the public’s minds off of the deceased Jeffrey Epstein and the possibility that he pimped underage minor teenage girls for President Donald Trump.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qut0wPBpb6A
(deceased) Jeffrey Epstein's pimp-helper, Ghislaine Maxwell, is questioned by DOJ July 24, 2025
The only question I have about the July 24 meeting of Ghislaine
Maxwell and members of the Department of Justice questioning
her, is if they were setting a perjury trap.
For example, “is a rainbow yellow, answer yes or no!”
And if you are intimidated and threatened into answering
either yes or no, you lose.
Is a rainbow yellow? Partly, but if you say, “yes” you are
concealing the other colors.
Is a rainbow yellow? If you say “no” because the majority
of colors are not yellow, then you are fraudulently
concealing that it is partially yellow.
When a prosecutor or judge demands you
answer a question, “yes” or “no”, they may be seriously and
willfully and intentionally obstructing the whole truth.
Now, because Ghislaine Maxwell was subpoenaed to
give testimony before a U.S. Congressional hearing
upcoming August 11, 2025,
the answers to her July 24th questioning by the DOJ
may be used by the US Congress to try to trick her
and get her to give slightly
different answers to a question worded in a different
way, all so they can claim she committed perjury.
Because the DOJ questioned her July 24th
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/politics/ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-interview.html
and the US Congress committee will question her
August 11th, there is a high liklihood that this
is a perjury trap.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025.07.23-Subpoena-Cover-Letter-to-Maxwell-FINAL.pdf
July 28, Has Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney figured out how to save her & President Donald Trump?
All the co-conspirators, the pimps and the johns, apparently
should all have the benefit of a plea agreement the now deceased
Jeffrey Epstein made years ago.
If you believe the “Jane Doe” and “Katie Johnson”
stories that Donald Trump de-flowered
a young virgin underage minor girl, then he should be a co-conspirator?
I think what they are getting at
in this newest document filed before the Supreme Court of the
United States, July 28, 2025,
is that Ghislaine Maxwell and President Donald Trump
(even though they do not mention his name)
should have the benefit of the old Jeffrey Epstein plea bargain.
Magic wand! Poof! Fairy dust!
No more problems for either Ghislaine Maxwell
or President Donald Trump.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1073/368155/20250728111721067_24-1073ReplyInSupportOfPetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf
No. 24-1073
In The Supreme Court of the United States
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Petitioner
v.
United States of America, Respondent
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
… July 28, 2025
…(blah, blah, blah) page 10 …
“Petitioner’s alleged status as Epstein’s co-conspirator
was the entire basis of her prosecution. The NPA’s
language demonstrates that the parties anticipated
that there were additional co-conspirators beyond
those already known. By using “including but not
limited to” before naming some individuals, the
government knowingly extended the beneft of the
bargain to other unnamed individuals who participated
in Epstein’s offenses. Whether the government
attorneys personally knew the identities of every such
person is beside the point; they certainly knew there
could be others (hence the language).”
U.S. Congress House Oversight Committee starts getting to work on the Epstein questions!
If CNN reporters “reach out” in an undefined and unclarified way to a list of famous people
in order to question them before closed-door depositions in the United States Congress
House Oversight Committee, then
(1) does CNN intend to oversee the oversight committee;
(2) could CNN coach these famous folks on how to answer
deposition questions to suit the slanted political goals of CNN;
(3) will CNN use this opportunity to make money by telling the public
what the people being questioned are expected to say,
because CNN might record them before the depositions?
Is it possible that CNN doesn’t want to report the news,
they really want to control the outcome?
“CNN is reaching out to those subpoenaed.”
…”individuals subpoenaed for closed-door depositions between August and October are: Former Attorneys General Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales; former FBI Director James Comey; former special counsel Robert Mueller III; former Secretary of State and first lady Hillary Clinton; and former President Bill Clinton.”…
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/05/politics/subpoenas-doj-epstein-files-clintons-barr-mueller-garland-congress
Probably not.
Probably not.